|
|
The three founding myths of corporate-led
social responsibility (continued...)
In the third and final
installment of our series, "The
Three Founding Myths of Corporate-Led Social Responsibility," we
turn to the fundamental question: Who can be trusted to protect workers'
rights in corporate supply chains?Myth #3: Corporations can be trusted to unilaterally investigate, and to determine any appropriate corrective action, when their suppliers violate their workers' human rights. Can the corporations themselves be expected to police their suppliers' operations and determine the appropriate actions in the event violations are found? Or, to be effective, and therefore credible, must workers themselves have a voice in the protection of their own rights, in the investigation and resolution of complaints, in a partnership for responsibility with the corporations that benefit from their labor? You will probably not be surprised to learn that Ahold and the CIW don't see eye to eye on the answer.
We
got this...
Ahold's perspective on the
question is clear, and is captured in this single sentence from its Statement
on the Campaign for Fair Food:
For
more on this final, powerful counterpoint to Ahold's myths about
corporate-led social responsibility, head over to the CIW
website!
|
|
By Ray Beckerman
Man's inhumanity to man and other living things threatens the whole human experiment. Let's fight it, and try to build a future.
Thursday, May 9, 2013
3 myths of corporate-led social responsibility ~ @ciw
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
I have a few simple comment rules:
(a) No
1. rudeness
2. falsehood
3. deception
4. unfair tactics
5. comment spam
6. shilling or trolling
(b) stay on topic; and
(c) anonymous comments are okay, but sign with a handle so we'll know which "Anonymous" you are.
Thanks for commenting.
Ray